Chieffo v. Hearst Corp.
This text of 2 A.D.2d 707 (Chieffo v. Hearst Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical expenses and loss of services, a separate defense is asserted alleging that the female appellant was respondent’s employee at the time she sustained the injuries complained of, and that her exclusive remedy is under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The appeal is from an order denying a motion under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out the defense as insufficient on its face. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, TJghetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.2d 707, 153 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chieffo-v-hearst-corp-nyappdiv-1956.