Chidi N. Anunka v. Joan Campbell

Eighth Circuit

Chidi N. Anunka v. Joan Campbell

13 F. App'x 475

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 5, 2001

Docket01-1192

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 F. App'x 475 (Chidi N. Anunka v. Joan Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chidi N. Anunka v. Joan Campbell, 13 F. App'x 475 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chidi N. Anunka appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. *476 § 1983 action as time-barred. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree that the complaint was filed after the expiration of the applicable six-year limitations period, see Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989); Berg v. Groschen, 437 N.W.2d 75, 77 (Minn.Ct.App.1989), and that the circumstances did not justify equitable tolling, see Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 269, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); Ochs v. Streater, Inc., 568 N.W.2d 858, 860 (Minn.Ct.App.1997). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The HONORABLE JOHN R. TUNHEIM, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE FRANKLIN L. NOEL, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Chidi N. Anunka appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. *476 § 1983 action as time-barred. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree that the complaint was filed after the expiration of the applicable six-year limitations period, see Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989); Berg v. Groschen, 437 N.W.2d 75, 77 (Minn.Ct.App.1989), and that the circumstances did not justify equitable tolling, see Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 269, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); Ochs v. Streater, Inc., 568 N.W.2d 858, 860 (Minn.Ct.App.1997). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The HONORABLE JOHN R. TUNHEIM, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE FRANKLIN L. NOEL, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chidi-n-anunka-v-joan-campbell-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack