Chidester v. Drake

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Chidester v. Drake

3 N.J.L. 903

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

Pennington, J.

— The first, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth errors assigned, are not supported by the [*] record. The second and fourth, state no cause of reversal, even if true. The third, complains of insufficiency in the state of demand, which consists of a single charge, of a balance on [658]*658settlement of account, on or about the 29th December, 1810, $$30 04, 'which is fully sufficient. I am of opinion, that judgment be affirmed.

Munyan, Attorney for plaintiff. The other Judges concurred.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennington, J.

— The first, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth errors assigned, are not supported by the [*] record. The second and fourth, state no cause of reversal, even if true. The third, complains of insufficiency in the state of demand, which consists of a single charge, of a balance on [658]*658settlement of account, on or about the 29th December, 1810, $$30 04, 'which is fully sufficient. I am of opinion, that judgment be affirmed.

Munyan, Attorney for plaintiff. The other Judges concurred.

Judgment affirmed.

Chidester v. Drake, 3 N.J.L. 903 (N.J. 1811).

Pincite

3 N.J.L. 903 (Chidester v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.