Chicklis v. State

823 So. 2d 201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10302, 2002 WL 1626199
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2002·No. No. 4D02-1938·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying Louis Chicklis’ petition for writ of ha-beas corpus for belated motion for post-conviction relief. On remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant retained counsel to timely file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and whether counsel failed to timely file such a motion. See Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986, 987 (Fla.1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1999); Krasnick v. State, 780 So.2d 1045, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicklis v. State, 823 So. 2d 201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10302, 2002 WL 1626199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

823 So. 2d 201 (Chicklis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krasnick v. State
780 So. 2d 1045 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Medrano v. State
748 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)