Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Chicklis v. State

Chicklis v. State

823 So. 2d 201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10302, 2002 WL 1626199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 2002
DocketNo. 4D02-1938
StatusPublished

This text of 823 So. 2d 201 (Chicklis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicklis v. State, 823 So. 2d 201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10302, 2002 WL 1626199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying Louis Chicklis’ petition for writ of ha-beas corpus for belated motion for post-conviction relief. On remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant retained counsel to timely file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and whether counsel failed to timely file such a motion. See Medrano v. State, 748 So.2d 986, 987 (Fla.1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1999); Krasnick v. State, 780 So.2d 1045, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

GUNTHER, WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krasnick v. State
780 So. 2d 1045 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Medrano v. State
748 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 So. 2d 201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10302, 2002 WL 1626199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicklis-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.