Chicken Delight Eastern, Inc. v. Ro-En Paper Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chicken Delight Eastern, Inc. v. Ro-En Paper Corp.

32 A.D.2d 945, 303 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 945 (Chicken Delight Eastern, Inc. v. Ro-En Paper Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicken Delight Eastern, Inc. v. Ro-En Paper Corp., 32 A.D.2d 945, 303 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 8, 1968, as, on two separate motions by plaintiff, (1) dismissed the two affirmative defenses in defendant’s answer to the complaint and (2) vacated in part defendant’s notice of examination before trial. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motions to dismiss the affirma[946]*946tive defenses and for a protective order denied. In our opinion, the affirmative defenses are sufficient in law to warrant a trial. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 8, 1968, as, on two separate motions by plaintiff, (1) dismissed the two affirmative defenses in defendant’s answer to the complaint and (2) vacated in part defendant’s notice of examination before trial. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motions to dismiss the affirma[946]*946tive defenses and for a protective order denied. In our opinion, the affirmative defenses are sufficient in law to warrant a trial. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 945, 303 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicken-delight-eastern-inc-v-ro-en-paper-corp-nyappdiv-1969.