Chickasha Nat. Bank v. May

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Chickasha Nat. Bank v. May

1915 OK 670, 151 P. 1074, 51 Okla. 275, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 971

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 21, 1915·No. 5356·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Grady county by James Fitzpatrick et al. against Lee May et al., the trial of which resulted in judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which *276 judgment Chickasha National Bank appeals. The appeal was filed in this court July 11, 1913. The cause was duly submitted on the record September 13, 1915.

Plaintiff in error has filed no brief, and assigned no reason for failure to file brief, and the appeal will be considered as abandoned by the plaintiff in error. The appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Grady county by James Fitzpatrick et al. against Lee May et al., the trial of which resulted in judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which *276 judgment Chickasha National Bank appeals. The appeal was filed in this court July 11, 1913. The cause was duly submitted on the record September 13, 1915.

Plaintiff in error has filed no brief, and assigned no reason for failure to file brief, and the appeal will be considered as abandoned by the plaintiff in error. The appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Chickasha Nat. Bank v. May, 1915 OK 670, 151 P. 1074, 51 Okla. 275, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 971 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

1915 OK 670 (Chickasha Nat. Bank v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.