Chickasaw Wood Products Co. v. Vail-Donaldson Co.

136 So. 87, 173 La. 59, 1931 La. LEXIS 1820
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 22, 1931
DocketNo. 28894.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 136 So. 87 (Chickasaw Wood Products Co. v. Vail-Donaldson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chickasaw Wood Products Co. v. Vail-Donaldson Co., 136 So. 87, 173 La. 59, 1931 La. LEXIS 1820 (La. 1931).

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

The plaintiff sued for $2,938.49, being the price of two carloads of cooperage, or keg heading, sold to the defendant. The main defense to the suit was that the grade or quality of the heading which the plaintiff shipped was not of the grade or quality ordered. It was admitted by the plaintiff during the trial of the case that one carload of the heading, which the defendant or its customer had refused to accept, and which amounted to $1,-470.01 of the amount sued for, was after-wards sold by the plaintiff for $1,049.30, or at a loss of only $420.71, and that the plaintiff had given the defendant sredit for the $1,049.-30, and was therefore claiming only $1,889.19. The district court gave the plaintiff a judgment for that amount; and the defendant appealed to this court.

This court has not appellate jurisdiction in an ordinary suit on a contract or on an account unless the amount in dispute exceeds $2,000, exclusive of interest. Const, art. 7, § 10. Where the amount in dispute does not exceed $2,000, exclusive of interest, the Court of Appeal has appellate jurisdiction. Const, art. 7, § 29. It is the amount remaining in dispute at the time when the case is submitted to the district court for decision that determines whether the case is appealable to the Supreme Court or to the Court of Appeal. If, in a suit for more than $2,000, a remittitur is entered or an admission made before the case is submitted to the district court for decision, reducing the amount in dispute to or below $2,000, exclusive of interest, the case is appealable to the Court of Appeal and not to the Supreme Court. State ex rel. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Judge, 21 La. Ann. 728; Zacharie v. Lyons, 22 La. Ann. 618; Girardey & Co. v. City of New Orleans, 26 La. Ann. 291; Stubbs v. McGuire, 33 La. Ann. 1089; Denegre v. Moran, 35 La. Ann. 346; Guidry v. Garland, 41 La. Ann. 756, 6 So. 563; State ex rel. Boyet v. Boone, 42 La. Ann. 982, 8 So. 468; State ex rel. Beauvais v. Judges, 48 La. Ann. 676, 19 So. 617; State ex rel. Taylor v. Judges, 107 La. 784, 32 So. 186; Borde v. Lazarus, *61 Michel & Lazarus, 127 La. 124, 53 So. 465; Wolf v. Thomas, 137 La. 833, 69 So. 269; Crawford, Jenkins & Booth v. Fisher, 144 La. 130, 80 So. 224; Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co., 145 La. 823, 83 So. 25; Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Lynch, 157 La. 21, 101 So. 797; Nelson v. Continental Asphalt & Petroleum Co., 157 La. 491, 102 So. 583; A. Baldwin & Co. v. McCain, 159 La. 966, 106 So. 459; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans C. & B. Towboat Co., 168 La. 1093, 123 So. 724; Steeg Printing & Publishing Co. v. Auto Lec Stores, 172 La. 565,134 So. 746; Givens v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Co., 173 La. 372, 137 So. 66, handed down today.

It is ordered that this case be transferred to the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit, provided that, if the record be not filed in that court within thirty days from the date on which this decree shall have become final, the appeal shall stand dismissed at the appellant’s cost. The appellant is to pay the costs of the present appeal, all other court costs to abide the final disposition of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pillsbury Mills, Inc. v. Chehardy
90 So. 2d 797 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Irwin v. McGee
93 So. 2d 17 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1956)
Hunter v. Hussey
85 So. 2d 246 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Griffin v. Bank of Abbeville & Trust Co.
69 So. 2d 153 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)
Kennedy v. Perry Timber Co.
46 So. 2d 312 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
Walker v. Fitzgerald
37 So. 2d 712 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1948)
S.P. Weaver Lumber Supply Co. v. Price
14 So. 2d 580 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1943)
State v. Cook
3 So. 2d 114 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Rockefeller v. Eggleston
177 So. 124 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Carlock v. Kusin
167 So. 459 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Southern Amusement Co.
146 So. 316 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 87, 173 La. 59, 1931 La. LEXIS 1820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chickasaw-wood-products-co-v-vail-donaldson-co-la-1931.