Chick v. Cravens
531 S.W.2d 319
Opinion
The application of Randy Chick, et al., for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. In taking such action, we do not necessarily approve the holding that the testamentary nature of the codicil to the will was a question of fact. The respondent, Linda Cravens, Executrix, did not file an application for writ of error seeking rendition of judgment rather than a remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chick v. Cravens, 531 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. 1975).
531 S.W.2d 319 (Chick v. Cravens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Nelson v. Neal
764 S.W.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Hoffman v. Irizarry
673 S.W.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Wilson v. Estate of Wilson
593 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Johnson v. Hewitt
539 S.W.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Watkins v. Boykin
536 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)