Chick v. Cravens
531 S.W.2d 319
This text of 531 S.W.2d 319 (Chick v. Cravens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chick v. Cravens, 531 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. 1975).
Opinion
The application of Randy Chick, et al., for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. In taking such action, we do not necessarily approve the holding that the testamentary nature of the codicil to the will was a question of fact. The respondent, Linda Cravens, Executrix, did not file an application for writ of error seeking rendition of judgment rather than a remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Estate of Nelson v. Neal
764 S.W.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Hoffman v. Irizarry
673 S.W.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Wilson v. Estate of Wilson
593 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Johnson v. Hewitt
539 S.W.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Watkins v. Boykin
536 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
531 S.W.2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chick-v-cravens-tex-1975.