Chick v. Chick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Chick v. Chick

969 S.W.2d 387, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1193, 1998 WL 326779

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 1998

DocketNo. WD 54839

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 969 S.W.2d 387 (Chick v. Chick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chick v. Chick, 969 S.W.2d 387, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1193, 1998 WL 326779 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Floyd Marvin Chick appeals from a “judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage” entered on July 29, 1997, by The Honorable Sara J. Miller, commissioner of the circuit court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court recently decided, in Slay v. Slay, 965 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. banc 1998), that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the findings and recommendations of a family court commissioner which have not been signed by a judge. See also State ex rel. York v.Daugherty, 969 S.W.2d 223, (Mo. banc 1998). We find no record of a judgment entered by a person selected for office in accordance with, and authorized to exercise judicial power by, Article V of Missouri’s constitution. Because no final, appealable judgment has been entered, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal pursuant to Rule 74.01.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Floyd Marvin Chick appeals from a “judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage” entered on July 29, 1997, by The Honorable Sara J. Miller, commissioner of the circuit court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Supreme Court recently decided, in Slay v. Slay, 965 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. banc 1998), that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from the findings and recommendations of a family court commissioner which have not been signed by a judge. See also State ex rel. York v.Daugherty, 969 S.W.2d 223, (Mo. banc 1998). We find no record of a judgment entered by a person selected for office in accordance with, and authorized to exercise judicial power by, Article V of Missouri’s constitution. Because no final, appealable judgment has been entered, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal pursuant to Rule 74.01.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 S.W.2d 387, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1193, 1998 WL 326779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chick-v-chick-moctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack