Chichester v. Whiteleather
This text of 51 Ill. 259 (Chichester v. Whiteleather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
The second instruction given on behalf of the plaintiffs, and to which the defendant' excepted, should not have been given.
The dispute between the parties was, as to the existence of any contract to deliver osage orange seed to the plaintiff. That was the important point in controversy, and the instruction throughout assumes that such a contract was made. It was strictly the province of the jury, unaided by any opinion from the court, to pronounce upon that fact.
For this reason, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Ill. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chichester-v-whiteleather-ill-1869.