Chicas v. Doe

166 So. 3d 238, 2015 La. LEXIS 687, 2015 WL 2066933
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 1, 2015
DocketNo. 2015-CC-0147
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 So. 3d 238 (Chicas v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicas v. Doe, 166 So. 3d 238, 2015 La. LEXIS 687, 2015 WL 2066933 (La. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

h Granted. The regulations of the Commissioner of Insurance, as contained in LDOI Bulletin 08-02, provide for a box on the UM selection form which the insurer may use for policy information purposes, such as policy number, binder number, application number, etc. The regulations further provide, “[t]his box does not need to be filled in for the form to be properly completed.” In light of this provision, the absence of a blank box for the policy number does not create a question of fact concerning the form’s validity. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and summary judgment is granted in favor of relator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weems v. Houston Specialty Ins. Co.
222 So. 3d 728 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 3d 238, 2015 La. LEXIS 687, 2015 WL 2066933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicas-v-doe-la-2015.