Chicago & W. I. R. R. v. DeMarko

Appellate Court of Illinois

Chicago & W. I. R. R. v. DeMarko

51 Ill. App. 581, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 649

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 1, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 51 Ill. App. 581 (Chicago & W. I. R. R. v. DeMarko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago & W. I. R. R. v. DeMarko, 51 Ill. App. 581, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 649 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In the common law record of this case we find no error. We can not consider that portion of the transcript sought to be made a record by a bill of exceptions, because the so-called bill of exceptions was not sealed as well as signed by the judge who certified thereto.

It is indispensable that a bill of exceptions be signed and sealed by the judge by whom the same is made. Widows and Orphans’ Beneficiary Association v. Powers, 30 Ill. App. 82; Clive v. The Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas R. R. Co., 41 Ill. App. 516; Miller v. Jenkins, 44 Ill. 443; James v. Sprague, 2 Scam. 55; Mason v. Gibson, 13 Ill. App. 463; Morse v. Williams, 4 Scam. 285; Cowhick v. Gunn, 2 Scam. 417.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI