Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand

238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 19, 1931·No. File Nos. 7132, 7149.·Published

Opinion

This action was commenced to recover taxes paid under protest by the defendant, and was by agreement not determined until after the decision by this court of the case of Simmons v. Ericson,54 S.D. 429, 223 N.W. 342. After the decision in that case, the trial court upon stipulated facts made conclusions of law and entered judgment against the defendants. *Page 120 The defendants have appealed. The contentions of the defendant upon this appeal are without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

POLLEY, P.J., and CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand, 238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119 (S.D. 1931).

238 N.W. 304 (Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. Ericson
223 N.W. 342 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1929)