Home/South Dakota Supreme Court/Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand

238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 19, 1931
DocketFile Nos. 7132, 7149.
StatusPublished

This text of 238 N.W. 304 (Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis Omaha Ry. v. Wienand, 238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119 (S.D. 1931).

Opinion

This action was commenced to recover taxes paid under protest by the defendant, and was by agreement not determined until after the decision by this court of the case of Simmons v. Ericson,54 S.D. 429, 223 N.W. 342. After the decision in that case, the trial court upon stipulated facts made conclusions of law and entered judgment against the defendants. *Page 120 The defendants have appealed. The contentions of the defendant upon this appeal are without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

POLLEY, P.J., and CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmons v. Ericson
223 N.W. 342 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-st-paul-minneapolis-omaha-ry-v-wienand-sd-1931.