Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Wienand, Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Wienand, Co.

238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119, 1931 S.D. LEXIS 163

South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 19, 1931·No. File Nos. 7132, 7149·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was -commenced to recover taxes paid under protest by the defendant, and was by agreement not determined until after the decision by this court of the case of Simmons v. Ericson, 54 S. D. 429, 223 N. W. 342. After the decision in that case, the trial court upon stipulated facts made conclusions of law and entered judgment against the defendants. [120] The defendants have appealed. The contentions of the defendant upon this appeal are without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

POLLEY, P. J, and' CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was -commenced to recover taxes paid under protest by the defendant, and was by agreement not determined until after the decision by this court of the case of Simmons v. Ericson, 54 S. D. 429, 223 N. W. 342. After the decision in that case, the trial court upon stipulated facts made conclusions of law and entered judgment against the defendants. [120] The defendants have appealed. The contentions of the defendant upon this appeal are without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

POLLEY, P. J, and' CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Wienand, Co., 238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119, 1931 S.D. LEXIS 163 (S.D. 1931).

Pincite

238 N.W. 304 (Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Wienand, Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related