Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Wienand, Co.
This text of 238 N.W. 304 (Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co. v. Wienand, Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was -commenced to recover taxes paid under protest by the defendant, and was by agreement not determined until after the decision by this court of the case of Simmons v. Ericson, 54 S. D. 429, 223 N. W. 342. After the decision in that case, the trial court upon stipulated facts made conclusions of law and entered judgment against the defendants. [120]*120The defendants have appealed. The contentions of the defendant upon this appeal are without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 N.W. 304, 59 S.D. 119, 1931 S.D. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-st-paul-minneapolis-omaha-ry-co-v-wienand-co-sd-1931.