Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Latta

Supreme Court

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Latta

226 U.S. 519, 33 S. Ct. 155, 57 L. Ed. 328, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2258

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 6, 1913

Docket231

StatusPublished

Cited by50 cases

This text of 226 U.S. 519 (Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Latta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Latta, 226 U.S. 519, 33 S. Ct. 155, 57 L. Ed. 328, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2258 (1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lurton

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action to recover the full value of two horses lost in the course of interstate transportation. ,

The' defense in substance was that the plaintiff had declared the value of each of the animals to not.exceed one hundred dollars, and had signed a shipping contract wherein he agreed that that was the value and that the company’s liability in case of loss or damage should not exceed the agreed value. It was also shown that the schedule of tariff rates was based upon values and that a higher rate was allowable if a higher value had been declared. It was claimed that a limitation of liability made *520 for the purpose of obtaining the lower of alternative rates was admissible under the provisions of § 20 of the Interstate Commerce Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 584, c. 3591.

The Circuit Court instructed a verdict for the agreed value, ruling that the contract was valid and was controlled by the Interstate Commerce Acts. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this judgment, upon the ground that the contract was invalid under the constituí tion of the State of Nebraska, and held the plaintiff entitled to recover the full value of the animals. 172 Fed. Rep. 850. The case was remanded to the Circuit Cóuit, where, in pursuance of the judgment and opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, the jury was instructed that it should find the actual value of the animals lost ,and return a verdict for that amount. Upon a second writ of error this judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, and the cause has come to this court upon a writ of certiorari.

The case is governed by the cases of Adams Express Company v. Croninger, and C., B. & Q. Ry. v. Miller, both just decided.

Judgment reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Lurton

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action to recover the full value of two horses lost in the course of interstate transportation. ,

The' defense in substance was that the plaintiff had declared the value of each of the animals to not.exceed one hundred dollars, and had signed a shipping contract wherein he agreed that that was the value and that the company’s liability in case of loss or damage should not exceed the agreed value. It was also shown that the schedule of tariff rates was based upon values and that a higher rate was allowable if a higher value had been declared. It was claimed that a limitation of liability made *520 for the purpose of obtaining the lower of alternative rates was admissible under the provisions of § 20 of the Interstate Commerce Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 584, c. 3591.

The Circuit Court instructed a verdict for the agreed value, ruling that the contract was valid and was controlled by the Interstate Commerce Acts. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this judgment, upon the ground that the contract was invalid under the constituí tion of the State of Nebraska, and held the plaintiff entitled to recover the full value of the animals. 172 Fed. Rep. 850. The case was remanded to the Circuit Cóuit, where, in pursuance of the judgment and opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, the jury was instructed that it should find the actual value of the animals lost ,and return a verdict for that amount. Upon a second writ of error this judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, and the cause has come to this court upon a writ of certiorari.

The case is governed by the cases of Adams Express Company v. Croninger, and C., B. & Q. Ry. v. Miller, both just decided.

Judgment reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 U.S. 519, 33 S. Ct. 155, 57 L. Ed. 328, 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-st-paul-minneapolis-omaha-railway-co-v-latta-scotus-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack