Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co. v. Commercial Bank

58 Ill. App. 438, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 70
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 22, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Ill. App. 438 (Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co. v. Commercial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co. v. Commercial Bank, 58 Ill. App. 438, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 70 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A lengthy statement of facts here would only serve to show that the case involves this question: When bills of exchange drawn on twenty days’ sight are attached to bills of lading, and the drawee accepts the bills of exchange but does not receive the bills of lading, and there is no evidence of any arrangement or instructions from the holder of the bills of exchange relating to the bills of lading, is the delivery by the carrier to the acceptor a wrong delivery for which the carrier is responsible to the holder of the bills of exchange % If the acceptor was entitled to the bills of lading, it can hardly be contended that the mere fact that they were not delivered to him, there being no evidence of any design by anybody, could make any difference in the rights or liabilities of the holder of the bills of exchange or the carrier.

We read National Bank v. Merchants Bank, 1 Otto, 91 U. S. 92, as decisive in favor of the carrier, and therefore reverse without remanding, that the question may at once go before the Supreme Court. Keversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Union Pacific Railroad
91 U.S. 72 (Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ill. App. 438, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-st-paul-kansas-city-railway-co-v-commercial-bank-illappct-1895.