Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. Elliott

108 Mo. 321
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Black, J.

This was a proceeding to condemn property fór a railroad right of way. Commissioners Were duly appointed to assess damages. To their report the company filed exceptions contending, among other things, that the damages were excessive and praying for a reassessment by a jury. After hearing much evidence the court overruled the exceptions, and, hence, this appeal.

We have held on several occasions that in proceedings like this either party is entitled, as a matter of constitutional right, to have the damages reassessed by a jury. The court should have awarded a jury upon demand made therefor-without further showing. Railroad v. Miller, 106 Mo. 458, and cases cited.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. Elliott, 108 Mo. 321 (Mo. 1891).

108 Mo. 321 (Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. Elliott
24 S.W. 53 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)