Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaughter

106 S.W. 208, 84 Ark. 423, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 241
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 25, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 S.W. 208 (Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaughter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Slaughter, 106 S.W. 208, 84 Ark. 423, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 241 (Ark. 1907).

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The contract itself showed that the parties to it contemplated that the cattle were to be delivered by appellant to a connecting carrier. For it expressly limits the liability to injuries occurring on its own line, and specifies that the liability of appellant “terminates upon delivery iby it of said cars to its connecting carrier.” The proof showed that appellee’s cattle at Wister “were delivered to the Frisco, and carried from there by them to St. Louis.” This evidence was at least prima facie proof that the Frisco was a connecting carrier, and, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, was sufficient to warrant a finding to that effect. The court, in passing upon the evidence offered, well understood the contention of appellant that the Frisco was a connecting carrier, and the ruling indicates that the court assumed that such was the fact, without the necessity of further proof upon the subject. The court erred in giving the instruction set out in the statement, and in refusing the request asked by appellant.

The trial court, under the rule announced by this court in Little Rock & F. S. Ry. Co. v. Odom, 63 Ark. 326, should have confined the inquiry to the damage, if any, produced by the negligence of appellant, before the delivery of the cattle to the connecting carrier. See also Taylor v. Little Rock, M. R. & T. R. Co., 32 Ark. 393; Packard v. Taylor, 35 Ark. 402; St. Louis, I. M. & Sou. Ry. Co. v. Weakley, 50 Ark. 397; International & G. N. R. Co. v. Ernest & Bost, 77 S. W. 29, 30; and International & G. N. R. Co. v. Starts, 77 S. W. 1.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cotton
112 S.W. 742 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.W. 208, 84 Ark. 423, 1907 Ark. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-rock-island-pacific-railway-co-v-slaughter-ark-1907.