Home/Supreme Court/Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Murphy

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Murphy

271 U.S. 642, 46 S. Ct. 472, 70 L. Ed. 1128, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 651
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 19, 1926
DocketNo. 231
StatusPublished

This text of 271 U.S. 642 (Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Murphy, 271 U.S. 642, 46 S. Ct. 472, 70 L. Ed. 1128, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 651 (1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, .as amended by the act of September 6, [643]*6431916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Mr. A. T. Boys, with whom Messrs. W. R. Bleakmore, W. F. Dickinson, M. L. Bell, Thomas P. Littlepage, John Barry, and W. F. Collins were on the brief for plaintiff in error. Messrs. W. C. Stevens, A. J. Morris, and Riford Bond, for defendants in error, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 U.S. 642, 46 S. Ct. 472, 70 L. Ed. 1128, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-rock-island-pacific-railway-co-v-murphy-scotus-1926.