Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Chicago & Riverdale Lumber Co. v. Quinliven

Chicago & Riverdale Lumber Co. v. Quinliven

204 Ill. App. 166, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 313
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 19, 1917
DocketGen. No. 22,550
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 Ill. App. 166 (Chicago & Riverdale Lumber Co. v. Quinliven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago & Riverdale Lumber Co. v. Quinliven, 204 Ill. App. 166, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 313 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Mechanics’ liens, § 73*—when subcontractor is not estopped to sue owner and contractor. A subcontractor is not estopped to sue the owner of a building and a contractor having a contract for the remodeling thereof by the conduct of his agent where the owner, after notice of the subcontractor’s claim, pays the contractor within ten days after delivery of materials to him, without deducting the subcontractor’s claim, although an agent of the subcontractor had previously told the owner to make such payment to the contractor and notify him, which the owner had done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capital Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Snyder
275 N.E.2d 663 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 Ill. App. 166, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-riverdale-lumber-co-v-quinliven-illappct-1917.