Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil
183 F. 962, 106 C.C.A. 302, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1911·No. Nos. 2,895, 2,897, 2,898, 2,899·Published
Opinion
Save that the complainant in the Circuit Court was identical with the complainant in the prior suit in the state court, these cases are in all respects like Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Weil, 183 Fed. 956. decided to-day; and for the reasons given in the opinion in that ease tile decree in each of these eases is reversed, to the same extent and with like directions as in that ease.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil, 183 F. 962, 106 C.C.A. 302, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465 (8th Cir. 1911).
183 F. 962 (Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Weil
183 F. 956 (Eighth Circuit, 1911)