Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil

Eighth Circuit

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil

183 F. 962, 106 C.C.A. 302, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 10, 1911

DocketNos. 2,895, 2,897, 2,898, 2,899

StatusPublished

This text of 183 F. 962 (Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weil, 183 F. 962, 106 C.C.A. 302, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465 (8th Cir. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

Save that the complainant in the Circuit Court was identical with the complainant in the prior suit in the state court, these cases are in all respects like Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Weil, 183 Fed. 956. decided to-day; and for the reasons given in the opinion in that ease tile decree in each of these eases is reversed, to the same extent and with like directions as in that ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.

Save that the complainant in the Circuit Court was identical with the complainant in the prior suit in the state court, these cases are in all respects like Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Weil, 183 Fed. 956. decided to-day; and for the reasons given in the opinion in that ease tile decree in each of these eases is reversed, to the same extent and with like directions as in that ease.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 F. 962, 106 C.C.A. 302, 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-r-i-p-ry-co-v-weil-ca8-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack