Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State

1912 OK 830, 128 P. 900, 35 Okla. 214, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 552
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 5, 1912
Docket3472
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1912 OK 830 (Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State, 1912 OK 830, 128 P. 900, 35 Okla. 214, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 552 (Okla. 1912).

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma has filed, in writing, certain recommendations for modification by this court as to order No. 503, involved in this appeal. All the attorneys for the appellants, and the Attorney General, for the state, appeared in open court and by agreement’ submitted the case upon the record in this appeal and said recommendations of the commission and waived the filing of briefs.

It is ordered that the commission’s recommendations be adopted, and in lieu of the rates, rules, and regulations contained *215 in the original Order No. 503, that the rates, rules, and regulations contained in said recommendations, which are as follows:

CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA.
Cause No. 1,350. Order No. 503.
To the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Clinton & Oklahoma Western Railway Company, Ft. Smith & Western Railroad Company, Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Midland Valley Railroad Company, Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, Missouri, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Company, Oklahoma Central Railway Company, St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Company, St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, and Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Company:
It is hereby ordered that on and after the 24th day of July, 1911, the railroads and railways named above shall not assess or collect a greater rate for the shipment, in carload lots, of the commodities named herein between points on their lines in this state than provided herein, and that, in so far as they are applicable, the rules and regulations named herein shall govern the handling and assessment of charges upon such commodities' between points in the state of Oklahoma, and otherwise to be governed by rules heretofore or hereafter issued by this commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Hartin
1932 OK 205 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Love v. North American Co.
229 F. 103 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK 830, 128 P. 900, 35 Okla. 214, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-r-i-p-ry-co-v-state-okla-1912.