Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Monahan

223 N.W. 344, 54 S.D. 434, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 347
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 1929·No. File No. 5895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, by its complaint herein, sought to present the proposition that chapter 102, Laws 1923, is unconstitutional in so far as it purports to permit, under -certain circumstances and in certain school districts, a lower rate of tax levy upon agricultural land than upon other taxable property in the district. [435] While the pleading is in some respects perhaps defective, we are nevertheless of the opinion that it is sufficient to raise the constitutional question. A 'demurrer was interposed to the complaint.and sustained, and the appeal taken.

The unconstitutionality of chapter 102, Laws 1923, in the particular above mentioned, has been determined by the opinion in Simmons v. Ericson, 54 S. D. —, 223 N. W. 342, this day filed.

Upon the authority of that case, the order here appealed from is reversed.

MISER, C., sitting in lieu of SHERWOOD, P. J. BROWN, J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Monahan, 223 N.W. 344, 54 S.D. 434, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 347 (S.D. 1929).

223 N.W. 344 (Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Monahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Young
244 N.W. 370 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1932)