Chicago Paint & Wall Paper Co. v. Hollahan

67 Ill. App. 601, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 178
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 28, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Ill. App. 601 (Chicago Paint & Wall Paper Co. v. Hollahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago Paint & Wall Paper Co. v. Hollahan, 67 Ill. App. 601, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 178 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellees having entered in the Circuit Court their general appearance, thereby waived all irregularities in the means by which that court acquired jurisdiction of the cause.

The trial in the Circuit Court was to be de novo, and the irregularity of failing to perfect the appeal until twenty-six days after the judgment by the justice, could be waived. Mitchell v. Jacobs et al., 17 Ill. 235; Randolph v. Emerick, 13 Ill. 344; Grallimore v. Dazey, 12 Ill. 143.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallimore v. Dazey
12 Ill. 143 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1850)
Randolph v. Emerick
13 Ill. 344 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1851)
Mitchell v. Jacobs
17 Ill. 235 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ill. App. 601, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-paint-wall-paper-co-v-hollahan-illappct-1896.