Chicago, P. & M. R. R. Co. v. Pigg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Chicago, P. & M. R. R. Co. v. Pigg

63 Ill. App. 163, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 945

DecidedMarch 7, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Ill. App. 163 (Chicago, P. & M. R. R. Co. v. Pigg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago, P. & M. R. R. Co. v. Pigg, 63 Ill. App. 163, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 945 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scofield

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellee sued appellant for damages to his property in the city of Mt. Vernon, arising from the construction of appellant’s railroad, and recovered a judgment for $55.

It is contended that the measure of damages was improperly stated to the jury. However that may be, the verdict is justified by the evidence and the judgment should be sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scofield

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellee sued appellant for damages to his property in the city of Mt. Vernon, arising from the construction of appellant’s railroad, and recovered a judgment for $55.

It is contended that the measure of damages was improperly stated to the jury. However that may be, the verdict is justified by the evidence and the judgment should be sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Ill. App. 163, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-p-m-r-r-co-v-pigg-illappct-1896.