Chicago, P. & M. R. R. Co. v. Daniel
This text of 63 Ill. App. 161 (Chicago, P. & M. R. R. Co. v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellee sued appellant for damages to his property in the city of Mt. Vernon, arising from the construction of appellant’s railroad, and recovered judgment for $175.
It is said that the court erred in the instructions to the jury on the question of damages. Even if the court did so err, the judgment should not be reversed if it is clearly right under the evidence. We are of the opinion that the verdict is not excessive, but that, on the contrary, a larger verdict would have been justified.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Ill. App. 161, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-p-m-r-r-co-v-daniel-illappct-1896.