Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago

149 Ill. 495
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The questions raised in these eases are the same. They are appeals from judgments of condemnation across appellant’s right of way, for streets. We regard the questions discussed in the argument of counsel for appellant as settled adversely to their contention by the decisions of this court already announced. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago, 148 Ill. 141; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 138 id. 453; Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago, 140 id. 309; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 141 id. 586.

The judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago, 149 Ill. 495 (Ill. 1894).

149 Ill. 495 (Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. Walsh
456 N.E.2d 601 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1983)
Morris & Essex Railroad v. City of Orange
43 A. 730 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1899)