Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

376 U.S. 941

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 380 U.S. 448 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 9, 1964·No. No. 710·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The motion to strike the memorandum of the Solicitor General is denied. [942]*942Probable jurisdiction noted.

Jordan Jay Hillman and John C. Danielson for appellant. Philip H. Porter and R. K. Merrill for appellees. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission in support of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The motion to strike the memorandum of the Solicitor General is denied. [942]*942Probable jurisdiction noted.

Jordan Jay Hillman and John C. Danielson for appellant. Philip H. Porter and R. K. Merrill for appellees. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission in support of appellant.

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad, 376 U.S. 941 (1964).

Pincite

376 U.S. 941 (Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.