Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
This text of 382 U.S. 422 (Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
86 S.Ct. 616
15 L.Ed.2d 498
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al.
v.
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
No. 751.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
v.
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
No. 752.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson, for appellants Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. and others.
Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.
Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrz, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H. Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand, for appellees.
Jan. 24, 1966.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
382 U.S. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-north-western-railway-co-v-chicago-burlington-quincy-scotus-1965.