Home/Supreme Court/Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch

242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1413
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 4, 1916
DocketNo. 474
StatusPublished

This text of 242 U.S. 616 (Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch, 242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1413 (1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central National Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99; Thompson v. St. [617]*617Louis, 241 U. S. 637. Mr. Heman H. Field for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Merritt J. Gordon for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield
183 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Schlosser v. Hemphill
198 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission
226 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Thompson v. City of St. Louis
241 U.S. 637 (Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railway-co-v-bolch-scotus-1916.