Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch
242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1413
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Haseltine v. Central National Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99; Thompson v. St. [617]*617Louis, 241 U. S. 637. Mr. Heman H. Field for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Merritt J. Gordon for the defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch, 242 U.S. 616, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1413 (1916).
242 U.S. 616 (Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bolch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield
183 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Schlosser v. Hemphill
198 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission
226 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Thompson v. City of St. Louis
241 U.S. 637 (Supreme Court, 1916)