Chicago Milk Shippers Ass'n v. Ford

46 Ill. App. 576, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 436
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 31, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Ill. App. 576 (Chicago Milk Shippers Ass'n v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago Milk Shippers Ass'n v. Ford, 46 Ill. App. 576, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 436 (Ill. Ct. App. 1892).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary.

The appellant sued the appellees for milk sold and delivered and not paid for, during October, 1891, to the amount of $433.80.

The only defense was under, the act approved June 11, 1891, entitled “ An Act to provide for the punishment of persons, co-partnerships or corporations forming pools, trusts and combines, and modes of procedure and rules of evidence in such cases.” Session Laws 1891, 206; BrachvelPs Edition, 78. The sections of that act material in this case are:

“ Sec. 1. If any corporation organized under the laws of this or any other state or country, for transacting or conducting any kind of business in this State, or any partnership or individual or other association of persons whosoever shall create, enter into, become a member of or a party to any pool, trust, agreement, combination, confederation or understanding with any other corporation, partnership, individual or any other person or any other association of persons, to regulate or fix the price of any article of xnerchand ise or commodity, or shall enter into, become a member of or a party to any pool, agreement, contract, combination or confederation to fix or limit the amount or quantity of any article, commodity or merchandise to be manufactured, mined, produced or sold in this State, such corporation, partnership or individual or other association of persons, shall he deemed and adjudged guilty of conspiracy to defraud, and be subject to indictment and punishment as provided in this act.

“ Sec. 2. It shall not be lawful for any corporation to issue or to own trust certificates, or for any corporation, agent, officer or employes, or the directors or stockholders of any corporation, to enter into any combination, contract or agreement with any person or persons, corporation or corporations, or with any stockholder or director thereof, the purpose and effect of which combination, contract or agreement shall be to place the management or control of such combination or combinations, or the manufactured product thereof, in the hands of any trustee or trustees, with the intent to limit or fix the price, or lessen the production and sale of any article of commerce, use or consumption, or to prevent, restrict or diminish the manufacture or output of any such articles.

“ Sec. 6. Any purchaser of any article or commodity from any individual, company or corporation transacting business contrary to any provision of the preceding section of this act, shall not be liable for the price or payment of such articles or commodity and may plead this act as a defense to any suit for such price or payment.” The case was tried upon the following :

Stipulation as to Facts.

“ That the plaintiff is a corporation, organized and doing business in the manner shown by the constitution and bylaws hereto attached, and that said constitution shall be evidence in this cause of the facts herein stated; that it received milk from various persons operating under and in connection with said association, all of whom are members of and stockholders in said association, and accounts to them for the same, and guarantees to them payment for milk so sold by said plaintiff to the customers of said plaintiff; that said association fixes and determines the price' at which such milk shall be sold, precisely as set forth in said constitution and by-laws ; that said plaintiff on April 5, 1891, fixed the price of its milk for the ensuing six months 'as follows:

During the months of May and June, seventy-five cents per can.

During the months of July, August and September, eighty cents per can; and

During the month of October, ninety cents per can, all in the year 1891.

And defendants agreed to said prices, and to receive and pay for milk during said period of six months at said prices, at the date of the guaranty hereto attached.

That all the milk for which the plaintiff claims the right to recover in this suit was received from the plaintiff by the persons so consigning the same, in the manner aforesaid, and was delivered to the defendant G. 0. Ford, during the month of October, 1891, under and pursuant to the agreement and arrangement previously referred to, and a written guaranty accompanying the same, which is herewith offered in evidence, and forms a part of the admitted facts in this case.

That all said business between said plaintiff and defendants was done and transacted under and pursuant to the aforesaid regulations of said association, and that for and on account of the milk so sold and delivered under said arrangement during said month of October, there is yet a balance unpaid to the plaintiff by the defendant 0. C. Ford, of four hundred and thirty-three dollars and eighty cents (§133.80).

It is further stipulated that this cause shall stand for trial as if the written guaranty introduced in evidence had been properly specially declared upon, and that the pleas filed by defendant properly related thereto; also that replication stands to said pleas; also that the number of the stockholders (members) of said association, is approximately fifteen hundred (1,500), and was at the date aforesaid.

Constitution and G-enebal Laws of the

Incorporated Joint-Stock Association of Milk Shippers and Producers, Tributary to the City of Chicago.

Article I. Mame and Object.

Section 1. This company shall be known as the Chicago Milk Shippers’ Association.

Sec. 2. The objects of the incorporation of this association shall be to secure to the producer of milk a just return for the sale of the same; to rid the field of city distribution of irresponsible and dishonest dealers ; to establish a central bureau of information for the shippers’ benefit, and to secure to the dealer of milk a pure, wholesome and honest quality of that product.

Article II. Jurisdiction and General Office.

Section 1. This association shall have jurisdiction over all districts shipping dairy products to the City of Chicago, in which local organizations of milk shippers have been, or may hereafter be, established in accordance with the regulations hereinafter provided.

Sec. 2. The general office of this association shall be permanently located in the City of Chicago and State of Illinois.

Article III. Capital.

Section 1. This association shall be incorporated with a capital of one hundred thousand dollars, which shall be divided into ten thousand shai-es of ten dollars each.

Article IY. Board of Directors and Duties.

Section 1. A board of directors, to consist of nineteen members, shall be chosen by ballot at the first regular meeting of the stockholders, and annually thereafter.

Sec. 2. The board of directors shall hold its second regular meeting upon the last Tuesday of March, 1892, and annually thereafter. The board may be convened by the secretary at any time, whenever a request.shall be made by five members of the same.

Sec. 3. It shall be the duty of the board of directors upon the day of its selection to proceed to elect by ballot, for the term of one year, a president, a secretary and a treasurer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ill. App. 576, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-milk-shippers-assn-v-ford-illappct-1892.