Chicago Lumber Co. v. Davis

47 N.W. 1079, 82 Iowa 731
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided February 4, 1891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Granger, J.

I.—The short-hand notes of the evidence taken on the trial were not extended and the transcript filed within six months, as provided by Code, section 2742, and the holdings of this court in Arts v. Culbertson, 73 Iowa, 13, and Kavaleir v. Machula, 77 Iowa, 121. For this reason appellee moves to strike the evidence from the record, and the motion must be sustained.

[732] II. Appellants filed a motion to strike the additional abstract from the files because not filed within the time provided by the rules of this cou’»t. No prejudice appears from the neglect to file within the time, and under the rule announced in Green v. Ronen, 62 Iowa, SO, the motion must be refused. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago Lumber Co. v. Davis, 47 N.W. 1079, 82 Iowa 731 (iowa 1891).

47 N.W. 1079 (Chicago Lumber Co. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Wellslager
74 N.W. 914 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Price v. Baldauf
57 N.W. 710 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)