Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. Duggan
This text of 60 Ill. 137 (Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. Duggan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the rule is, that the plaintiff must be confined, after the defendant has closed, to merely rebutting testimony, we can not interfere with the discretion of the court below in this matter, unless we can plainly see that injustice has been done. In this ease, it is not probable any injury accrued to the plaintiff because the rule was so far disregarded as to permit new witnesses to be sworn as to the extent of the damages. The defendant was not surprised by testimony as to new facts, the only objection being that the evidence was-cumulative.
The instructions were correct, and the verdict is not unsus-tained by the evidence;
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Ill. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-iowa-railroad-v-duggan-ill-1871.