Chicago Insurance Company v. Robert E. Camors, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
This text of 420 F.2d 376 (Chicago Insurance Company v. Robert E. Camors, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
420 F.2d 376
CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert E. CAMORS et al., Defendants, and
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 28165.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
February 2, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia at Atlanta; Newell Edenfield, Judge.
Hugh E. Wright, Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
Edward S. White, Lynn Downey, Donald M. Fain, M. Ken. Doss, Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before JONES, BELL, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court rendered a comprehensive opinion in disposing of this matter. The judgment appealed from is affirmed on that opinion. Chicago Insurance Company v. Camors, N.D.Ga., 1969, 296 F.Supp. 1335.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F.2d 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-insurance-company-v-robert-e-camors-and-st-paul-fire-and-marine-ca5-1970.