Chicago Insulated Wire & Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 1195
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided March 7, 1928·No. Docket No. 2380·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1196] OPINION.

Littleton:

The written consent entered into between petitioner and the Commissioner expired April 1, 1924. The Commissioner made the assessment on March 25, 1924, which was within the period agreed upon. The amount assessed and now claimed by the Commissioner has never been collected. Since the five-year period within which the Commissioner might collect any amount from the taxpayer as a tax expired under the statute and the consent before the passage of the Revenue Act of 1924, collection of the proposed deficiency is now barred by the statute of limitations. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., 6 B. T. A. 1045; Theodore H. Wickwire, Jr., et al., Executors, 10 B. T. A. 102; Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co., 273 U. S. 346.

Judgment of no deficiency will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago Insulated Wire & Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 10 B.T.A. 1195 (bta 1928).

10 B.T.A. 1195 (Chicago Insulated Wire & Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago Insulated Wire & Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 1195 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)