Chicago Ins. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.
This text of 109 F. 352 (Chicago Ins. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are content with our conclusion upon the merits, as declared. 108 Fed. 271. It is now urged that we have not provided for the payment of interest from the date of the filing of the libel upon the amount which may be found due the libelant upon the policy of insurance as we have construed it. The question of interest was not suggested at the bar, and was not considered by the court. Nothing in the opinion contained prevents the court below from the allowance of interest if it be so advised, and if it be consonant with the law and the fact so to do, — a question with which we are not now concerned, and upon which we express no opinion. The petition is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. 352, 48 C.C.A. 397, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-ins-v-graham-morton-transp-co-ca7-1901.