Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Monarch Lumber Co.

202 Ill. App. 20, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 817
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 14, 1916·No. Gen. No. 21,787·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McDonald

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Cashiers, § 211*—when evidence shows acceptance by consignee of shipment. In an action to recover transportation charges and demurrage on a shipment consigned to defendant, evidence that defendant directed plaintiff, a railroad company, to deliver the shipment to another company, and to collect its charges from such third party, and that later, on the refusal of such third party to accept the shipment, defendant directed plaintiff to forward it to defendant, held sufficient to show an acceptance of the shipment by defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Monarch Lumber Co., 202 Ill. App. 20, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 817 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

202 Ill. App. 20 (Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Monarch Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alton Railroad v. Gillarde
37 N.E.2d 571 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1941)
New York Cent. R. v. Little-Jones Coal Co.
25 F. Supp. 337 (N.D. Illinois, 1938)
Inner Group Financing Corp. v. Halsted Exchange National Bank
4 N.E.2d 905 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Novotny v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance
4 N.E.2d 978 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Mellon v. Landeck
248 Ill. App. 353 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad v. Lieberman
245 Ill. App. 503 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Pere Marquette Railroad v. American Coal & Supply Co.
239 Ill. App. 139 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1925)
Evans v. Schwartz
211 Ill. App. 573 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
Lyons v. Kanter
210 Ill. App. 78 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)