Chicago & Indianapolis Air Line Railway Co. v. Johnston

89 Ind. 88
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1883
DocketNo. 9632
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 89 Ind. 88 (Chicago & Indianapolis Air Line Railway Co. v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago & Indianapolis Air Line Railway Co. v. Johnston, 89 Ind. 88 (Ind. 1883).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The summons issued in this case named the-appellant, who was the defendant below, The Chicago and Indianapolis Air Line Railroad Company. On appellee’s motion default was entered and judgment taken on the 7th day of June, 1881; on the 14th day of that month, and at the same term, the judgment and default were set aside and theappellee permitted to amend the summons and return by inserting, as the name of the defendant, The Chicago and Indianapolis Air Line Railway Company, and the defendant was. again defaulted and judgment entered in appellee’s favor.

We think there is no error warranting a reversal. The-power of the court to set aside a default during the term is-undoubted. Burnside v. Ennis, 43 Ind. 411; McClellan v. Binkley, 78 Ind. 503.

The mistake in using the word “road ” instead of “way,” in the writ, was one which might be cured by amendment, and no-error was committed in permitting the amendment of the writ and service. The proper representatives of the appellant are affirmatively shown to have had due notice of the action, and there-was, therefore, full opportunity to make defence. It would, as it seems to us, be unjust to permit the appellant to allow the action to go undefended and then secure a reversal, without taking any steps in the trial court, because of the error-in giving its name in the complaint and summons.

Judgment affirmed.

Hammond, J., did not take part in the decision of this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henderson v. Dreyfus
191 P. 455 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1920)
Goodman v. City of Ft. Collins
164 F. 970 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)
Davis v. Davis
40 N.E. 803 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Durre v. Brown
34 N.E. 577 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Ind. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-indianapolis-air-line-railway-co-v-johnston-ind-1883.