Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Grant

Eighth Circuit

Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Grant

166 F. 1019, 92 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4313

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 9, 1909·No. No. 2,930·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After an attentive examination of the record in this case, we deem it sufficient to announce our conclusion that the evidence was such as to warrant the submission to the jury of the issues of fact, that the court’s charge to the jury was pertinent, accurate, and sufficiently comprehensive, and that there was no error in the admission or rejection of evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After an attentive examination of the record in this case, we deem it sufficient to announce our conclusion that the evidence was such as to warrant the submission to the jury of the issues of fact, that the court’s charge to the jury was pertinent, accurate, and sufficiently comprehensive, and that there was no error in the admission or rejection of evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Grant, 166 F. 1019, 92 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4313 (8th Cir. 1909).

Pincite

166 F. 1019 (Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.