Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Air-O-flex Equipment Co.
126 N.W.2d 777, 267 Minn. 558, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 673
Opinion
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis denying recovery for freight undercharges claimed due from defendant for an interstate shipment of the component parts of a truck unloader which it manufactured.
The identical issue upon essentially identical facts was before us in Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Air-O-Flex Equipment Co. 267 Minn. 387, 126 N. W. (2d) 773, and our decision therein is controlling.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Air-O-flex Equipment Co., 126 N.W.2d 777, 267 Minn. 558, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 673 (Mich. 1964).
126 N.W.2d 777 (Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Air-O-flex Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Air-O-Flex Equipment Co.
126 N.W.2d 773 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1964)