Chicago Great Western Railroad Co. v. . State of New York
135 N.E. 960, 233 N.Y. 661, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1085
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chicago Great Western Railroad Co. v. . State of New York, 135 N.E. 960, 233 N.Y. 661, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1085 (N.Y. 1922).
135 N.E. 960 (Chicago Great Western Railroad Co. v. . State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.