Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler

134 Ill. App. 233, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 354

DecidedJune 1, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 134 Ill. App. 233 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler, 134 Ill. App. 233, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 354 (Ill. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee as the owner of lots No. 158 and 159 in the Car Shops addition to the city of Jacksonville recovered a verdict and judgment against appellants for $400 fot damages alleged to have resulted to said property by reason of the construction and operation of a railroad.

The questions presented by the record in this case are the same as those involved in the case of DeFreitas against the same defendants, and the opinion in -that case this day filed in this court controls the disposition of this case. (Ante, p. 228.)

If appellee will, within 20 days, remit $100 from the amount of his judgment, it will be affirmed for $300, otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Affirmed upon remittitur. Remittitur filed and judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellee as the owner of lots No. 158 and 159 in the Car Shops addition to the city of Jacksonville recovered a verdict and judgment against appellants for $400 fot damages alleged to have resulted to said property by reason of the construction and operation of a railroad.

The questions presented by the record in this case are the same as those involved in the case of DeFreitas against the same defendants, and the opinion in -that case this day filed in this court controls the disposition of this case. (Ante, p. 228.)

If appellee will, within 20 days, remit $100 from the amount of his judgment, it will be affirmed for $300, otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Affirmed upon remittitur. Remittitur filed and judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 Ill. App. 233, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-burlington-quincy-railway-co-v-steinkuehler-illappct-1907.