Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler

134 Ill. App. 233, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 354
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 1, 1907·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee as the owner of lots No. 158 and 159 in the Car Shops addition to the city of Jacksonville recovered a verdict and judgment against appellants for $400 fot damages alleged to have resulted to said property by reason of the construction and operation of a railroad.

The questions presented by the record in this case are the same as those involved in the case of DeFreitas against the same defendants, and the opinion in -that case this day filed in this court controls the disposition of this case. (Ante, p. 228.)

If appellee will, within 20 days, remit $100 from the amount of his judgment, it will be affirmed for $300, otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Affirmed upon remittitur. Remittitur filed and judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler, 134 Ill. App. 233, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 354 (Ill. Ct. App. 1907).

134 Ill. App. 233 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Steinkuehler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.