Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Peppard

64 Colo. 12
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1917
DocketNo. 8888
StatusPublished

This text of 64 Colo. 12 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Peppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Peppard, 64 Colo. 12 (Colo. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Garrigues

delivered the opinion of the court.

The amount and nature of the debt sued for, as shown by the record book kept for that purpose by the justice of the peace in whose court the action was originally commenced, is $65.00 damages for the killing of a cow by a train of the railroad company.

On the trial plaintiff was permitted over the objection of defendant, to testify that just prior to bringing the suit, he was approached by the company’s claim agent, who offered to pay him $27.00 or $27.50 in settlement for the animal killed, to the admission of which testimony an exception was reserved and error is assigned thereon.

This evidence was admitted for the purpose of showing an acknowledgment of the company’s liability, and in C. B. & Q. R. Co. v. Roberts, 26 Colo. 329, 57 Pac. 1076, such evidence is held to be an offer to compromise and incompetent. On the authority of that case the judgment must be reversed.

Reversed arid Remanded.

Decision en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Roberts
26 Colo. 329 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Colo. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-burlington-quincy-railroad-v-peppard-colo-1917.