Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. People ex rel. Kinzie

Illinois Supreme Court

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. People ex rel. Kinzie

178 Ill. 102

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 Ill. 102 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. People ex rel. Kinzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. People ex rel. Kinzie, 178 Ill. 102 (Ill. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The questions presented on this record are identical with those presented in St. Louis, Rock Island and Chicago Railroad Co. v. People ex rel. 177 Ill. 78. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasoning of that opinion. What is there said is conclusive of this case, and the judgment of the county court of Mercer county is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The questions presented on this record are identical with those presented in St. Louis, Rock Island and Chicago Railroad Co. v. People ex rel. 177 Ill. 78. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasoning of that opinion. What is there said is conclusive of this case, and the judgment of the county court of Mercer county is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 Ill. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-burlington-quincy-railroad-v-people-ex-rel-kinzie-ill-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack