Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. v. United States

287 U.S. 599, 77 L. Ed. 522, 53 S. Ct. 12, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 136
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1932·No. No. 109·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied. The motion to remand is also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. v. United States, 287 U.S. 599, 77 L. Ed. 522, 53 S. Ct. 12, 1932 U.S. LEXIS 136 (1932).

287 U.S. 599 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Americold Corp. v. United States
28 Fed. Cl. 747 (Federal Claims, 1993)
Erie Lackawanna Railway Company v. The United States
439 F.2d 194 (Court of Claims, 1971)
Fix v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange
413 S.W.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1967)
Brown v. Guarantee Insurance
319 P.2d 69 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
State Ex Rel. Bumgarner v. Sims
79 S.E.2d 277 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1953)
Knox v. First Security Bank of Utah
196 F.2d 112 (First Circuit, 1952)
National Surety Corp. v. United States
102 Ct. Cl. 671 (Court of Claims, 1944)
Gross Galesburg Co. v. Ingalls
26 N.E.2d 440 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)
Pflueger v. Sherman
75 F.2d 84 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)