Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. School District Number One

25 Neb. 359
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Neb. 359 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. School District Number One) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. School District Number One, 25 Neb. 359 (Neb. 1889).

Opinion

Reese, Ch. J.

The issues of law and of fact presented in this case, upon ' the controlling question, are the same as in Cass County v. C., B. & Q. Railroad Company, decided at the present term of this court.

As it is deemed unnecessary to examine the question presented, it must be sufficient to say that the'conclusion reached in this case is the same as in that; the judgment of the district court being in favor of defendant in error, it is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Neb. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-burlington-quincy-r-r-v-school-district-number-one-neb-1889.