Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. James
41 N.W. 993, 26 Neb. 194, 1889 Neb. LEXIS 98
This text of 41 N.W. 993 (Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. James, 41 N.W. 993, 26 Neb. 194, 1889 Neb. LEXIS 98 (Neb. 1889).
Opinion
The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the case of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. James, just decided, and the same judgment will be entered.
The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
41 N.W. 993, 26 Neb. 194, 1889 Neb. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-burlington-quincy-r-r-v-james-neb-1889.