Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Kirby

1901 OK 6, 63 P. 966, 10 Okla. 730, 1901 Okla. LEXIS 65
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 8, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 1901 OK 6 (Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Kirby, 1901 OK 6, 63 P. 966, 10 Okla. 730, 1901 Okla. LEXIS 65 (Okla. 1901).

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of the Chicago Building & Manufacturing Company v. Pewthers. That case was commenced before the same justice, change of venue taken to the same probate court. The judgments in the probate and district courts are the same in both cases, and the appeal taken in the same manner. And for the reasons stated in that case, the judgment of the district court of Payne county in this case is hereby affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

It is so ordered; and the district court of Payne county is "jhereby directed to return all of the papers certified to that court by the probate court of said county, with directions to that court to return the original papers from the justice’s court to said justice.

Burford, C. J., having presided in the court below, not sitting; all of the other Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kansas, Okla. & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Martin
1935 OK 1047 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Warren
1928 OK 260 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Clem Oil Co. v. Oliver
1924 OK 1165 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Tuloma Oil Co. v. Johantgen
1924 OK 994 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Grady v. Rice
1923 OK 1033 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Lausten v. Lausten
1916 OK 71 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co. v. Hudson
1916 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Shuffeldt v. Jefcoat
1915 OK 581 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Wm. Cameron & Co. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1
1914 OK 454 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. Vanderberg
1911 OK 158 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1901 OK 6, 63 P. 966, 10 Okla. 730, 1901 Okla. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-building-manufacturing-co-v-kirby-okla-1901.