Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
This text of 454 U.S. 1029 (Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. Motion of Frank M. Keesling for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument in tandem with No. 80-1745, F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New Mexico [probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 812], and No. 80-2015, ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission [probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 812]. Justice Powell and Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 U.S. 1029, 102 S. Ct. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-bridge-iron-co-v-caterpillar-tractor-co-scotus-1981.