Chicago Brick Co. v. Ryan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Chicago Brick Co. v. Ryan

165 Ill. App. 120, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 142

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 20, 1911

DocketGen. No. 15,985

StatusPublished

This text of 165 Ill. App. 120 (Chicago Brick Co. v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago Brick Co. v. Ryan, 165 Ill. App. 120, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 142 (Ill. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Baldwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal by Edward J. Ryan and Mary A. Ryan, his wife, from a decree entered April 9, 1909, establishing mechanic’s liens against the property owned by them, in favor of the appellees, Chicago Brick Company, the South Side Lumber Company, and William Downs.

By the decree, the court fixed the lien for Downs at a less amount than the master found in his favor, and upon this action Downs assigned cross errors. The entire record is identical with No. 15984, pending in this court, and the proofs and arguments presented by counsel are also the same. For the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, and filed this day, to which reference is hereby made {ante, p. 114), we find no reversible error in the action of the court below, and the decree will, accordingly, be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Baldwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal by Edward J. Ryan and Mary A. Ryan, his wife, from a decree entered April 9, 1909, establishing mechanic’s liens against the property owned by them, in favor of the appellees, Chicago Brick Company, the South Side Lumber Company, and William Downs.

By the decree, the court fixed the lien for Downs at a less amount than the master found in his favor, and upon this action Downs assigned cross errors. The entire record is identical with No. 15984, pending in this court, and the proofs and arguments presented by counsel are also the same. For the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, and filed this day, to which reference is hereby made {ante, p. 114), we find no reversible error in the action of the court below, and the decree will, accordingly, be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 Ill. App. 120, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-brick-co-v-ryan-illappct-1911.